Showing posts with label Lector Benevole. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lector Benevole. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Nationalism and the Giaour
The discussion on Tuesday definitely helped me understand the poem more, as I can never seem to grasp a political aspect from these from just reading them. On looking back though, it does make sense. The narrator uses diction that is often associated with national pride, like freedom and glory. These types of words show up in a lot of wartime poetry later on during the world wars. One thing that I still don't completely understand is that if each of the main characters are representations of the countries, with Leila as Greece, is Byron saying that Greece is dead? This seems somewhat anti-Muslim from what I can tell.
Monday, November 19, 2012
Thalaba and New Media
Thalaba is reminding me of certain tropes in literature and not even necessarily the epic aspect. It reminds me of the vengence type movies, or something like the orphaned superheroes (along the lines of Batman). Also, the "corporation of magicians" reminds me of conspiracy theories in something like the Da Vinci Code. Goes to show how themes get recycled.
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Authorial Intent
Authorial intent is a captivating and almost controversial subject. How much does an author really contribute to the meaning of his own work? With so many diverse opinions, most likely the question will never be sufficiently answered. Many readers want to solely rely on their interpretation of the text, and while this is one way of approaching a work, it sometimes does not seem completely satisfactory. I have heard arguments both admonishing the author's input and praising it. While I can understand that readers can pick up on elements of a work that an author did not intentionally include, it does not make sense to remove him from the process completely. I can only imagine creating a novel or poem, making a point that I thought was really important and having the public completely skip over it or change it into something else. I can't say I wouldn't write a preface myself.
Monday, October 29, 2012
The gothic and the soul
Throughout each of the readings, I keep finding myself asking what the authors and readers thought of death and the soul. Of course a phantom is not going to come snatch us away in the night (fingers crossed!) but these works deal with the idea of death and an afterlife in an interesting way. In Alonzo the Brave and its parody, the unfaithful female is swept off by the returned groom. This brings up questions of a soul returning to earth and a soul being kept on earth, which seems different than the typical "heaven or hell" question. The story of The Old Woman of Berkeley asks a similar question in, how long does a soul inhabit a body after death? The woman is in her coffin, supposedly dead, and yet the demon is able to take her away. Even in the Rime of the Ancient Mariner, the crew's bodies are possessed by good spirits. There seems to be an emphasis on superstition and twisting religious thought to some degree in the gothic.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Matthew Lewis Presentation
Matthew Gregory Lewis, "Tales of Wonder"
Biographical Information and Information Leading to Composition of "Tales of Wonder" [Citation for the below information: (Peck)]:
•Born July 9, 1775 to Frances Maria Sewell and Matthew
Lewis (both of whom came from well-known, respected, and relatively wealthy families).
•Eldest of 4 children--Matthew, Maria, Barrington (named after one of Matthew Lewis Sr.'s upper-level directors), Sophia
Elizabeth.
•Obtained his curiosity of entertainment from his mother, who had literary inclinations (early in his career, she acted as his literary agent and she eventually published poems herself).
•Obtained his curiosity of entertainment from his mother, who had literary inclinations (early in his career, she acted as his literary agent and she eventually published poems herself).
•The relationship between Matthew’s mother and father was
quite complicated, with Matthew caught in the middle. When Matthew was six, his
mother left her husband, taking the music master, Samuel Harrison as her lover.
Supposedly while separated, Matthew’s mother obtained a lover and frequently
moved in order to avoid her husband. Her husband discovered her secret and on
the day she birthed another man’s child, he showed up at her home. He later petitioned
for divorce because of her adultery (which she did not contest), but the bill
of divorce was rejected and they were married until death.
•As
a result, Matthew’s mother was forced to retreat from society and fled to
France. Matthew, being the eldest, played mediator between his parents and kept
in contact with both (he believed his father to be in the right, but held his
mother dear). He even told people that his mother was his aunt to avoid talking
about the awkward situation and hopefully never awaken the scandal.
•He spent his summer vacation of 1791 in Paris, where he
is said to have first been inspired in what would later become The Monk, his
most famous work.
•While in Paris, he would send his mother songs for plays
that she was writing and plays that he translated into English that she could
sell to Drury Lane (he frequently gave his mother money whenever he could).
•Matthew’s father wished for his son to take up a
diplomatic career (much like his own), so Matthew spent the summer of 1792 in
Germany. There in Weimar, he met Johann Wolfgang van Goethe, and his desire to
have something of his on stage grew.
•When Lewis graduated, he was fully intent on writing,
but passively accepted his father’s plan for him to have a career in diplomacy.
In 1794, his father got him a job in the British embassy to Holland.
•Lewis did not like The Hague (capital city of South
Holland in the Netherlands) or its Dutch citizens and because he was so bored,
he produced The Monk there in ten weeks.
•Lewis obtained a seat in Parliament in 1796 because of
his father.
•From age 14-21, he lived the acceptable life of the son
of a well-to-do government official. But during that time, one of the things
that remained constant was his drive to become an author.
•He said he would spend his time “scribbling Novels and
Plays” that thus had the power “to deluge the town with such an inundation of
Ghosts and Magicians, as would satisfy the thirst of the most insatiable
swallower of wonders."
•In 1802, Lewis withdrew from parliamentary career.
•Matthew and his father had a falling out 1803 when Lewis
Sr. became involved with a woman, Mrs. Ricketts, who forced her way into the family circle,
gained influence over him and caused him to treat his son poorly. Apparently, she claimed that the only reason they weren't married was because they were waiting for Matthew's mother to die. She also forced Lewis Sr. to write Matthew out of his will and instead leave the family fortune to her. They
superficially made up in 1805.
•Matthew’s father grew ill and died in 1812. It was discovered then that Matthew's father, while disappointed in Matthew's failed diplomatic career, never intended to disown his son and instead left almost all of the family fortune to Matthew.
•Poems was his last
publication.
•In 1815, he went to visit estates in the West Indies.
•In the summer of 1816, he visited Percy and Mary Shelley
at Geneva, Switzerland.
•In 1817, he took a second trip to Jamaica, which brought
on the yellow fever that resulted in his death on the voyage back to England.
He was buried at sea.
•There was no indication that Matthew Lewis ever had a serious love life. There are reports that he was heterosexual and had a relationship with a woman, but there are also reports that he was homosexual.
Composition:
The Monk (included because it contributes to "Tales of Wonder")
•The gothic was characterized by shock, debauchery, and
black magic. Most of Lewis’ work is categorized as being in the
“horror gothic” genre. ("Gothic Fiction")
•Education: Marylebone Seminary (where the students were largely of the nobility and gentry and the curriculum included Latin, Greek, French, writing, arithmetic, drawing, dancing, and fencing); Westminster School (at age 8, where he distinguished himself as an actor and showed his love of theatre); Christ Church-Oxford (at the age of 15, earned his B.A. in the Spring of 1794 and eventually his M.A.). This education is the exact same as his father's, who wanted Lewis to follow in his diplomatic footsteps (an aspiration that Lewis always followed, but never really engaged in, always having the desire to write). It is said that the violence he experienced at school between the boys of Westminster serves as inspiration for the violent nature of his Gothic work. (Peck) and (MacDonald)
•Education: Marylebone Seminary (where the students were largely of the nobility and gentry and the curriculum included Latin, Greek, French, writing, arithmetic, drawing, dancing, and fencing); Westminster School (at age 8, where he distinguished himself as an actor and showed his love of theatre); Christ Church-Oxford (at the age of 15, earned his B.A. in the Spring of 1794 and eventually his M.A.). This education is the exact same as his father's, who wanted Lewis to follow in his diplomatic footsteps (an aspiration that Lewis always followed, but never really engaged in, always having the desire to write). It is said that the violence he experienced at school between the boys of Westminster serves as inspiration for the violent nature of his Gothic work. (Peck) and (MacDonald)
•Lewis was influenced by Ann Radcliffe’s “The Mysteries
of Udolpho” and Horace Walpole’s “The Castle of Otranto” (Peck)
•Inspiration for the gothic nature of his work came from
places he had lived. Growing up, he lived in Stanstead Hall; an Old Nurse would frequently tell him stories
about a room in the house, which was supposed to be haunted. Lewis's sister Sophia
wrote to Walter Scott after her brother's death saying that Matthew would go “past that gloomy
chamber, [and] on the way to his dormitory, he would cast a glance of terror over his
shoulder, expecting to see the huge and strangely-carved folding doors fly
open, and disclose some of those fearful shapes that afterwards resolved
themselves into the ghastly machinery of his works. To such juvenile feelings
he ascribed some of the most stricking scenes in The Castle Spectre” (Peck). Matthew Lewis explained to Byron many years later that his
quarters at Weimar were haunted. Matthew Lewis was apparently "awakened every morning by the
rustling of papers in a closet adjoining his room but never found anyone there.
The servant of the house explained that this phenomenon was occasioned by the
ghost of the former owner, a mother who every day at the house of her death had
continue to search frantically the closet filled
with foreign newspapers for new of her only son, who had been lost at sea” (Peck).
•George Ticknor: “A very decent looking man compared with
the form my imagination had given to the author of The Monk and The Castle Spectre" (Peck).
•The Monk immediately achieved
celebrity status for Lewis, however, about a year after its appearance, an
injunction to restrain its sale was obtained. This led to a second edition in
which Lewis cited himself as the author and removed what he believed was
objectionable ("Monk Lewis")
•The Monk was so influential in his
career that it earned Lewis the nickname of “Monk” Lewis (Peck).
•Included four supernaturalist elements that exerted
great influence on the Gothic tradition of horror: the demonic temptress (or
succubus); the Bleeding Nun; the Wandering Jew; and the diabolous ex machina (Thomson).
•Success of The
Monk opened up the theatre to him and he wrote The
Castle Spectre, his most famous and
popular play (Peck).
•Like Walter Scott, Matthew Lewis collected and translated poems. In 1798, Lewis met William Erskine in London, who showed
him some of Walter Scott’s (then unknown) translated poems; Lewis expressed
interest in Scott and asked him to contribute to his Tales
of Wonder project. Walter Scott agreed because of the fame surrounding Lewis's name that came from The Monk's success (Peck).
•Lewis introduced Scott to London society, arranged that
his own publisher print some of Scott’s work, and used his influence in theatre
to have Scott’s House of Aspen produced (Peck).
•Tales of Wonder was first referred to as “Tales of Terror,” but then title
changed closer to publication (Peck).
•The poems that were included in Tales of Wonder were collected as early as 1793, but the work was
constantly delayed. This was due to several things, including Lewis’s desire for perfect translations of the four
elemental spirit poems [Walter Scott said about "The Erl-King" to a friend: “I
assure you, there is no small impudence in attempting a version of that ballad,
as it has been translated by Lewis” (Peck).] and his brother's death on January 13, 1800 (Peck).
•During this time, Scott was only patient with Lewis out
of respect, but printed An Apology for Tales of Wonder in 1799, 9 ballads which
later appeared in Tales of Wonder. Only 12 copies of this publication were sold and
labeled as specimens of printing.
•Accumulation of poems from Lewis, Sir Walter Scott, and
Robert Southey.
Publication:
•Very first edition printed at the end of 1800, early
1801 by J. Bell (Peck)
•Printed in two volumes (Peck).
• Royal octavo (where each page is 1/8 the size of the original piece of paper) on heavy paper, 10"
by 6¼" (Peck).
•Price: 1 guinea (Peck).
•Of 60 pieces, 2/3 had already been printed before (Peck).
•The Macbeth quote in the beginning was quite common for
Gothic-oriented words. It was considered “citing the Bard” as an "attempt by authors to provide a legitimizing presence for one of
the period’s most popular but
controversial forms of literary expression” (Lewis).
•Variety of metrical feet, stanza forms, and rhyme schemes (Peck).
•Included a range of subject matter, some representing Gothic
matter in its most violent (Osric the lion), some
attempting to ridicule Gothic verse, such as "Cinder King," and "Maid of the Moor" (Peck).
•Second London edition in 1801, which reduced the number of
ballads from 60 to 32 (Peck).
•Edition of 1836 only had 23, while an edition in 1925 only had
8 (Peck).
Reception:
•The public was disappointed by Tales
of Wonder. Lewis attributed this to false hopes raised by the delay, the
fact that the popularity of ballads was already decreasing, his own misguided
sense of humor (by including poems that mocked the Gothic style), and that by including many well-known poems, the work was
expanded to two expensive volumes (Peck).
•Lewis received much negative attention from critics, although
he was successful commercially. ("Matthew Lewis (writer)")
•Lewis received much criticism for having "for the author" on the title page of the first edition of Tales of Wonder. This statement usually means that all of the money earned by the book goes to the author, not the publisher. Many people called the work “Tales of Plunder” for this reason. It was changed to "for the publisher" in the second edition (Peck).
•Much of the negative criticism revolved around his dual
position as a parliamentary member and author. Some criticism was on the
grounds of a lack of originality. ("Matthew Lewis (writer)")
•Coleridge’s review, “Yes! The author of the Monk signs himself
a LEGISLATOR! We stare and tremble.” ("The Monk")
•Parreaux, “every reviewer or critic of the book, no matter how hostile
he was, felt compelled to at least pay lip-service to Lewis’s genius.” ("The Monk")
•Byron, in The English Bards and Scotch Reviewers,
"Wonder-working Lewis, Monk or Bard, who fain wouldst make Parnassus a
churchyard; Even Satan's self with thee might dread to dwell, And in thy skull
discern a deeper hell." Four years after this review, Lewis and Byron met and according to Mary
Shelley, Lewis asked Byron why he called him “Apollo’s sexton” to which Byron
found it “difficult to reply to this categorical species of reproof.” After
this encounter, they frequently spent time together. Byron valued Lewis’
friendship and profited from his literary advise. (Peck).
•Scott: “few
persons have exhibited more mastery of rhyme, or greater command over the
melody of verse” (Peck).
•More Wonders was an attack on Tales
of Wonder that appeared in pamphlet form in 1801, under the pseudonym
“Mauritius Moonshine” and was reviewed by the Monthly Mirror 9. Thomas Dermody later claimed authorship
in a letter to a friend. The letter and review date the parody before February
1801, making it the earliest satiric response to Tales
of Wonder. ("More Wonders")
•Tales of Terror is a collection of poems
that parodies the Tales of Wonder. It was anonymously
published and though some thought that Lewis was involved (because of the
original title of Tales of Wonder), but this was proved to
be untrue. This parody appeared in June of 1801. (Peck).
Bibliography:
"Gothic Fiction." Wikipedia. Wikimedia
Foundation, n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_fiction>.
Lewis, M. G. Tales of Wonder. Ed. Douglass H. Thomson. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview, 2010. Print.
MacDonald, D. L. Monk Lewis: A Critical Biography. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2000. Print.
"Matthew Lewis (writer)." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 2012. Web. 6 Oct. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Lewis_(writer)>.
"The Monk." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 2012. Web. 6 Oct. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monk>.
"Monk Lewis." Monk Lewis. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Oct. 2012. <http://personal.georgiasouthern.edu/~dougt/lewis.htm>.
"MORE WONDERS." MORE WONDERS. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Oct. 2012. <http://www.litgothic.com/Texts/dermody_wonders.html>.
Peck, Louis F. A Life of Matthew G. Lewis. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961. Print.
Thomson, Douglass H. "Information on Lewis and the Tales for Your Editorial Work."Personal Webpage of Douglass H. Thomson. Georgia Southern University, n.d. Web. <http://personal.georgiasouthern.edu/~dougt/lewis.htm>.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Lewis and the gothic
Lewis was really interesting to research. I enjoy the gothic genre and this type of literature seems to be something of a turning point. Lewis seems different even from The Last Lay or other narrative poetry in that it seems more focused on entertainment. The gothic is like the foundation of the horror genre, this is where we get the ticklish delight of all the racy, scandalous, suspense, scary. The supernatural is also more prominent here than in other works that we have read and Lewis takes things further than his contemporaries. Tales of Wonder fits well with the class since it's a collection of works, many of which Lewis translated.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Tendency Toward Narrative
As we are progressing through the readings, it seems as though we are seeing more texts that contain plot and character devices. There are numerous differences between the description- based texts, such as Darwin or the guide to the picturesque and more recent poems, like Child Harolde and The Lay of the Last Minstrel.
This is not to say that description and imagery is not a major component of The Lay but it is no longer the main focus of the poem, compared to the recounting of events.
This is not to say that description and imagery is not a major component of The Lay but it is no longer the main focus of the poem, compared to the recounting of events.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Nature in Keats
I enjoyed the Keats sonnets and the ode, particularly the way that he still worked in nature even though it wasn't the main focus. Mentioning the Heliconian springs, the forest branches, trodden weed, and the image of the eagle was just fantastic. I think the imagery that these sights of nature provide are beneficial to the spiritual and philisophical themes of the poems.
Monday, October 1, 2012
Females and Details
I suppose for starters, I do not necessarily agree with Schor's view of art and details. While an abundance of details cannot make up a story, neither can a lack of them. I believe toward the end, this aspect is conceded but I feel that it was not given its due. Although these are a means to an end, they are an important means and should be respected as such. Unfortunately, this view of inferiority is intimately tied to the gender of the artist and broad speculations about women and their art. In my opinion, most of the gender based assertions were unfounded, I have read plenty of books by male authors that are grounded in the minute details and female authors or artists easily rank among (and often above) many of their male peers. The perspective reminds me of "the angel in the house" of the Victorian era where the ideal woman is a dutiful, submissive wife and mother. Schor does not seem misogynistic in himself but merely reflects the society in which the female is seen as the milder or lesser sex.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Gender significance in Clare
I think someone else mentioned some confusion as to the gender of the nightingale but for me, it seemed to extend beyond that one poem. Several of the birds appeared to be portrayed as feminine and their eggs were specifically mentioned but other animals, such as the badger, were masculine. I may be reading too much into it, but the badger was linked to a much more violent existence than the other animals described and their almost...relaxing poems. Reading through, I wondered if Clare had a reason for doing this beyond the simple mother aspect of the birds or coincidence of factual representation.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Differences in Beauty and Picturesque
Reading through Wordsworth's poems emphasizes the differences between what can be considered beauty and picturesque. While the tourists are looking for an unmarked (or minimally marked) landscape, they are still interested in viewing it and the political/ social implications of what they see. However, in "Poems on the Naming of Places", Wordsworth discusses a place of beauty, "The spot was made by Nature for herself: The travellers know it not, and 'twill remain Unknown to them; but it is beautiful". While this could possibly also qualify as picturesque, it does not seem related to the equipment and rules of the picturesque observer.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
The Loves of the Plants and Personification
What really impressed me in Darwin's poem is also probably the most obvious aspect, the personification of the plants. For some reason or another, the way that he gave these plants hands, arms, or eyes to roll resonated with me and the vision that I as a reader gained from these descriptions. The language that was used created images that actually made me think of old cartoons in which plants and forest sprites interacted without human observation. These qualities were inevitably used in some way and exuded personality within these actions. Darwin adds a layer of humanity to the plants by giving them a certain personality whether it is when they "clap'd their rude hands" or the way one "lolls his red tongue". I almost felt that I could interact with them in the same way they related to each other.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

