The concept of nature was being re-embraced at this time in
the late eighteenth and into the nineteenth century. It was no longer seen as
evil and ugly. Writers were now describing nature as a part of humans and that
there was beauty in nature. This was a collective way of thinking or synthetic
vision. All things were considered. This
type of new poetry was less artificial and written in everyday language so that it
would broaden the reading audience.
There was a noticeable change in moving away from the prior more
difficult language in poems. Being connected with nature also implied religious
beliefs as one would go to nature to experience god. Wordsworth
refers to the woods having a spirit. Much like the rest of Wordsworth’s texts
he provides insight into sadness and joy, using his own feelings as a model. I felt that Wordsworth's use of language seemed much more laxed when compared to Gilpin. In my opinion it is more fluent to read Wordsworth because there is no restriction of formality as there is in Gilpin's text. I felt that Gilpin nip picked at nature and assigned certain landscape characteristics value at his own discretion and distaste to others.
It is very interesting that a poem can feel like it is more free than prose; Wordsworth produces this effect of freedom from constraints with his use of enjambment, carrying a thought over the end of lines and developing it over many lines. This makes his meditations feel drawn out and unconstrained by the form, even though he is using blank verse.
ReplyDelete