Wednesday, November 7, 2012
"The Preface" is counter-productive
After re-reading the preface, I feel like exploring Wordsworth's supposed "process of composition," since it was the hardest for me to pinpoint what his process actually entails. From what I could gather, it consists of 4 parts: perception/inspiration, recollection, analyzing that recollection and finally writing about that perception. According to Wordsworth, it's during this recollection phase that you can analyze your inspiration and realize the emotion you felt, but by doing this, doesn't that take away from the spontaneous aspect of emotion? If you sit and contemplate your emotions before writing about them, the end result is probably different from that of the original one. This brings up numerous inquiries, such as how spontaneous is Wordsworth experience at Tinturn Abbey if he sat and pondered this emotion for several hours, maybe even days? How accurate is the emotion he felt in that moment at Tinturn Abbey if he had to put his emotions into context? It's like waking up from a dream and attempting to recollect it later on: chances are, if you don't write down what you just experienced as you awoke, you're going to miss some key elements. And that's how I feel reading now reading the Lyrical Ballads with the preface.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
yes, this is the most interesting crux in the Preface! Wordsworth claims that good poetry comes of of the "spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings" but then he immediately qualifies this statement, and goes on to argue that poets write by "obeying blindly and mechanically the impulses of those habits" we have formed by contemplating our thoughts and feelings (175). How exactly is this possible? It seems we need to revise what we understand as "spontaneous" for this to make any sense--so, what is spontaneity for the poet of the Preface?
ReplyDelete